Analysis of the producer's social perception of silvopastoral systems and ecological connectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu202482Keywords:
silvopastoral system, ecological connectivity, characterize, analyze exploratory analysis, deductive analysisAbstract
This study was carried out in the village of El Roble, municipality of Florencia, department of Caquetá. The purpose of the research was to characterize the social perception of the producer about silvopastoral systems and ecological connectivity in the village, for which surveys, field visits and interviews were used as tools to collect information. A characterization of the perception of the producer who is interested in using a silvopastoral system as ecological connectivity was carried out, taking the field notes and the interview, the information was analyzed using atlas ti; an exploratory analysis (word cloud) and three deductive analyses were generated in which the producer expressed his knowledge and the interest in using the silvopastoral system as ecological connectivity was analyzed. The fact that the producer is interested in silvopastoral systems as ecological connectivity does not indicate that it will be implemented properly, therefore, a good accompaniment in the step by step of the productive transition supports the efficient management in which the environment will benefit
References
Betancourt, K., Ibrahim, M., Harvey, C. A., & Vargas, B. (2003). Efecto de la cobertura arbórea sobre el comportamiento animal en fincas ganaderas de doble propósito en Matiguás,Matagalpa, Nicaragua. Agroforestería en las Américas, 10(39–40), Article 39–40. http://bco.catie.ac.cr:8087/portal-revistas/index.php/AGRO/article/view/224
Bordino, J. (2022). Conectividad ecológica: Definición, características e importancia. https://www.ecologiaverde.com/conectividad-ecologica-definicion-caracteristicas-e-importancia-3703.html
Cabra, A. L. (2022). Ganadería extensiva, uno de los motores de la deforestación en Colombia. https://acortar.link/j7C2cU
Cajas-Giron, Y. S., & Sinclair, F. L. (2001). Characterization of multistrata silvopastoral
systems on seasonally dry pastures in the Caribbean Region of Colombia. Agroforestry Systems, 53(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013384706085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013384706085
De Witt; Gianotten, Vera. Investigación participativa en un contexto de economía campesina (Holanda). La Investigación participativa en América latina. CENAPRO. México, 1988.
Daily, G. C., Ceballos, G., Pacheco, J., Suzán, G., & Sánchez-Azofeifa, A. (2003). Countryside Biogeography of Neotropical Mammals: Conservation Opportunities in Agricultural Landscapes of Costa Rica. Conservation Biology, 17(6), 1814-1826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00298.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00298.x
Habermas, J. (1994). La teoría de la acción comunicativa, complementos y estudios predios. Madrid: Cátedra.
Espectador, E. (2020, septiembre 30). ELESPECTADOR.COM [Text]. ELESPECTADOR.COM. https://www.elespectador.com/ambiente/la-deforestacion-en-meta-guaviare-y-caqueta-esta-fuera-de-control-article/
GOV.CO. (2016, septiembre 11). Colombia, el segundo país más biodiverso del mundo. Minciencias. https://minciencias.gov.co/sala_de_prensa/colombia-el-segundo-pais-mas-biodiverso-del-mundo
Mancebo, Y. R. (2019). La conectividad del paisaje y su importancia para la biodiversidad. https://www.sabermas.umich.mx/secciones/articulos/526-la-conectividad-del-paisaje-y-su-importancia-para-la-biodiversidad.html
Navas, A. (2010). Importancia de los sistemas silvopastoriles en la reducción del estrés calórico en sistemas de producción ganadera tropical. Revista de Medicina Veterinaria, 19, 113–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19052/mv.782
Ortiz, P. N., & Alayón, J. A. (2021). Percepción social de servicios ambientales en sistema silvopastoril de pequeños ganaderos en Campeche. Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria, 25(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.53897/RevAIA.21.25.42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53897/RevAIA.21.25.42
Prensa Instituto Humboldt. (2021, febrero 10). Cauca, Nariño y Antioquia, los departamentos con más aves en Colombia. http://www.humboldt.org.co/es/boletines-y-comunicados/item/1599-cauca-narino-y-antioquia-los-departamentos-con-mas-aves-en-colombia
Rodriguez, D. K. (2022, septiembre 16). La deforestación en Colombia subió 11 % en el primer semestre de 2022. Portafolio.co. https://www.portafolio.co/economia/finanzas/deforestacion-en-colombia-como-esta-el-pais-en-2022-571261
Silvetti. (2011). Una revisión conceptual sobre la relación entre campesinos y servicios ecosistémicos. cuad. desarro. rural. file:///D:/USUARIO/Downloads/adminpujojs,+1652-5277-1-CE.pdf
Solís, L. D. M. (2019, mayo 28). El enfoque cualitativo de investigación. Investigalia. https://investigaliacr.com/investigacion/el-enfoque-cualitativo-de-investigacion/
Weston, R. H. (1982). Animal factors affecting feed intake. Nutritional Limits to Animal Production from Pastures : Proceedings of an International Symposium Held at St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia, August 24-28, 1981 / Edited by J.B. Hacker. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Animal+factors+affecting+feed+intake&author=Weston%2C+R.H.&publication_year=1982
Paquette, A., & Messier, C. (2010). The Role of Plantations in Managing the World’s Forests in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8. https://doi.org/10.2307/20696406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/080116
Plaza, G. P. (2020, marzo 4). ¿Porque se pierden los bosques en Caquetá? PID AMAZONIA. https://pidamazonia.com/content/%C2%BFporque-se-pierden-los-bosques-en-caquet%C3%A1
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brandon Alexis Cuellar Artunduaga, Verenice Sánchez Castillo (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
